Customer Reviews
Shaken, not stirred (6/10) - By: Demob Happy, 08 Jun 2008 
Most of the debate surrounding Ken Loach's 2006 Palme D'Or winner seems to be concerning the historical accuracy of the plot. Whereas I wouldn't suggest that these arguments are not important, it seems most critics forgot to evaluate the actual film craft: the style, acting, use of music & camera work etc. I'm not qualified to talk about how truthful 'The Wind that Shakes the Barley' is, except to say that it hardly seems as overly biased or unbalanced as some reviewers have pointed out. However, no one apparently has deigned to point out how utterly ordinary this film is. Propanganda or not, cinema can be a powerfully emotive tool but this is quite uninspired.
While 'The Wind That Shakes The Barley' is shot with relative lushness, Loach retains many of the economical prinicples of his filmmaking. The use of non-professional actors & semi-improvised dialogue, for instance, feels a little lacking when grafted onto a historical context, especially where melodrama takes over. In dealing with a small-scale guerilla unit & thereby localising the history to a human drama, we needed a script & actors who can deliver. Unfortunately, the characters are not greatly fleshed out beyond the kind of shouty sloganeering that we would expect from the political meetings that they are seen to attend.
That is the nagging paradoxin the `Wind that Shakes the Barley, a film that is richly photographed but amateurishly dramatised. More of a fully realised sense of time & place, of the Ireland the guerillas were fighting for, of their cultural & spiritual difference to the British, would have made this a more engaging piece. As what we end with is a history lesson told as hectoring theatre - a little too didactic, too wooden, & not cinematic enough. While by no means a bad film, it's Palme D'Or win smacks a little of too much politics & not enough of filmmaking talent.
An Irish Perspective - By: Avril, 01 Apr 2008 
I have to say I enjoyed this film immensely. I thought it brilliantly portrayed the struggle at the time & commend Ken Loach for tackling such a sensitive subject matter. The Black & Tans were notorious for their atrocities & we all grew upin Ireland listening to stories about them. They ransacked my Great-Grandparents' house & torched neighbouring villages. I am aware that they had come back from appalling world war one trench conditions & do realise that they were victims of the establishmentin Britain at that time. Ken Loach could perhaps have considered that but the fact remains that their treatment of the Irish was for the most part brutal & ultimately he is telling an Irish story albeit at a particular pointin time. Cillian Murphy is brilliant & Padraic Delaney is absolutely gorgeous. It's great to hear an authentic Cork accent on the silver screen too! I particulary liked the way Cillian visited the poor family as a Doctor & showed the appalling poverty that was prevalentin Ireland at the time.
The film might be a bit confusing if you haven't an iota of Irish history as really there were two civil wars going on. The one between the republican Irish & the Unionists (which obviously became a full blown civil warin the 60s & 70s) & then ultimately what the film depicts; the less famous civil war between the pro & anti-treaty forces following the War of Independence & the creation of the freesate (or what is now the Irish Republic) & Northern Ireland. Oh & just to set the record straight- an earlier reviewer commented that Ireland had agreed to the Act of Union with Britainin 1801. The vast majority of the native Irish did NOT have the right to votein 1801. Under the Penal Law system Catholics could not vote or become an MP (among other things-see Catholic Emancipation Act of 1829) until the advent of Daniel O' Connell & Parnell much later. It is however an excellent film made by a very talented & great Englishman. I highly recommend it.
Emotional History - By: A. Walker, 13 Jan 2008 I am sure there are a number of details within this film that may not be completely accurate but the film does communicate well the difficulties for families within this period.
Tremendous - By: pablo, 21 Nov 2007 
The Wind That Shakes The Barley is an interesting look at the early days of the IRA. Ken Loach's realistic style is perfect for an examination of this brutal conflict & the violence always seems terrifyingly real. The story of Damien & his family almost seems incidental at times but is ultimately very moving.
It is a true shame that movies like this have to be made out with the mainstream as they so often are so much more dramatic than the average Hollywood blockbuster.
A propaganda film with a predictable plot and weak acting - By: Triestino, 17 Nov 2007 
Many years ago, when I was a student, I saw a Soviet Russian film called, if memory serves right, The Happy Tractor Drivers of Kazakhstan. The film was set at harvest time, & at the climax, bronzed & beaming peasants broughtin the wheat, singing as they did so. Everyone was sunny & blonde & blue-eyed, everyone was filled with almost inexpressible joy, & at the end, there was a paean of praise to Communism & the triumph of the Soviet system. Odd though it may seem, The Wind that Shakes the Barley reminded me very powerfully of that old Soviet film. It goes without saying that the IRA heroes of the film are very different from their Russian counterparts. Instead of being bright & sunny & happy, they are dark & miserable & wretched, & grumble a great deal about their plight under the unspeakably evil British. But the subtlety of characterization is almost identicalin both films - the charactersin both of them are cardboard cut-outs, & the actingin both is almost laughably wooden. Both films employ a desperately simple plot that is utterly predictable from start to finish, & both are tediously long. If you like unalloyed propaganda & hate the British, you will find this film irresistible. If you like blood-spattered brutality of the Sam Peckinpah variety, you will also find much to admire. But otherwise, unless you are a masochist, you would be best advised to pass it by.
